This only took a few minutes, Balena's directions make it easy
https://foldforcovid.io/

Please join in!
You can install the Rosetta@Home package on your Raspberry Pi, as foldforcovid.io is based on R@H for job distribution.
There's none.
Normally I would agree with you dougie. I'm always warning people against downloading and running random images, debs, etc from the net.DougieLawson wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 10:12 pmThere's none.
It would have been much better as an open source package with a *.DEB to install it on an existing RPi. I won't touch what they're offering with with a 40ft barge pole.
I really cannot fathom the motivation behind that statement.DougieLawson wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 10:12 pmI suspect they're trying to get the credit from my RPi for their own Rosetta account if I run their closed SDCard image.
Because with a closed package you don't known what they're doing. They could be turning your RPi into a spam spewing botnet.Heater wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:17 amI really cannot fathom the motivation behind that statement.DougieLawson wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 10:12 pmI suspect they're trying to get the credit from my RPi for their own Rosetta account if I run their closed SDCard image.
That is true of course. However I think that is really unlikely and I have some trust in Balena. For reasons I mentioned above. Ultimately we have to put our trust in some people, we can each judge who and when for ourselves.DougieLawson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 12:06 pmBecause with a closed package you don't known what they're doing. They could be turning your RPi into a spam spewing botnet.Heater wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:17 amI really cannot fathom the motivation behind that statement.DougieLawson wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 10:12 pmI suspect they're trying to get the credit from my RPi for their own Rosetta account if I run their closed SDCard image.
Also why do I need this, if I want to run Rosetta why would I chose this rather than doing it myself with my own Rosetta account.
One possible difficulty with the Balena etcher image or any similar image from a well-meaning third party is not that it contains an intentional botnet, but that it may not receive security updates in the future. Moreover, it may not have been put together by someone with the requisite Linux packaging skills needed to ensure, for example, that a newly installed copy regenerates unique ssh host keys and various passwords. All these things could lead to the Pi joining a botnet in the future, or not. It is also possible, in particular, that the Balena image is put together very well and has none of the above shortcomings.Heater wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 12:23 pmThat is true of course. However I think that is really unlikely and I have some trust in Balena. For reasons I mentioned above. Ultimately we have to put our trust in some people, we can each judge who and when for ourselves.DougieLawson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 12:06 pmBecause with a closed package you don't known what they're doing. They could be turning your RPi into a spam spewing botnet.
Also why do I need this, if I want to run Rosetta why would I chose this rather than doing it myself with my own Rosetta account.
I suspect the idea behind this Rosetta image is that it is drop dead easy for those with little or no experience with the likes of Linux and the Pi to get up and running. Of course the rest of us can install and run it whatever way we like.
However none of that was what I was questioning about your statement. I can't for the life of me see why Balena would be doing this to get credits as you suggest. Even if that was their motivation for some perverse reason, so what?
As far as I can tell that Balena Rosetta image is not running any ssh server.ejolson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:01 pmAlthough an intentionally hidden Trojan or maintenance backdoor can be quite difficult to find, has anyone made a quick check whether the system, for example, regenerates the ssh host keys? What about automatic updates? While not super critical on their own, if these simple things have not been done properly, this would indicate, in my opinion, a level of danger with the entire setup.
It does sound like their experience and security credentials are good enough. I suspect it is a good idea to run any of the @home projects in a container or other virtualized environment, in case the project gets hacked at the source and starts sending out buggy workloads.Heater wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:35 pmBalena, formerly Resin.io, have been doing this since the Pi was new. I'm pretty sure they have covered as many security angles as possible.ejolson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 4:01 pmAlthough an intentionally hidden Trojan or maintenance backdoor can be quite difficult to find, has anyone made a quick check whether the system, for example, regenerates the ssh host keys? What about automatic updates? While not super critical on their own, if these simple things have not been done properly, this would indicate, in my opinion, a level of danger with the entire setup.
Quite so. If they bunged it into a docker image or something I would feel a bit safer.DougieLawson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 12:06 pmBecause with a closed package you don't known what they're doing. They could be turning your RPi into a spam spewing botnet.
Also why do I need this, if I want to run Rosetta why would I chose this rather than doing it myself with my own Rosetta account.
Because for most of us we have no way of judging the answer to any such question. We would have to take the opinion of some expert on trust.pi-anazazi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:30 amWhy does nobody question the usefulness of this whole thing in the first place? Classic case of we-have-to-do-something-itis...
Could the difference with overclocking be that the CPU gets hotter? Maybe it's also more fun.